Website for Alison Gibbons, Senior Lecturer in English. This site gives an overview of my academic outputs as well as links and commentary on my favourite things (language, literature, art). [The blog was originally called 'iconnote' and provided a platform of my musings on art and literature']
Friday, 10 June 2011
LIES Inc.
You know an exhibition is going to be out of the ordinary when, on entry, you're greeted by a disclaimer: "Please be warned - you enter at your own risk". There's been a lot of buzz surrounding Site Gallery's newest exhibition 'LIES Inc.', a retrospective of the work of Eva and Franco Mattes (its been touted in The Guardian and BBC). These are notoriously playful artists - 'pranksters' the BBC calls them who in The Guardian's words will be up to "some kind of no good". Controversy and intrigue are words that come to mind. Afterall, the two are known for stealing, with the help of distraction and a Swiss army knife, fragments from famous artworks by the likes of Warhol, Kadinsky, and Beuys.
The Sheffield exhibition opens with the pair's signature Catt, a sculpture which features a cat in a birdcage that Eva and Franco Mattes duped the art world with by passing it off as a work by Maurizio Cattelan. The most facinating piece exhibited in Site Gallery was, for me, a work called No Fun. No Fun exploits a live-webcam software tool called Chatroulette in which users 'gamble' by accessing and communicating with other Chatroulette users at random. When the unwitting participants click 'Next' and reach the live-feed from the camera Eva and Franco Mattes have set up, the image which greets them is that of an uncomfortably real-looking (but of course, staged) suicide. In No Fun, we can see both live feeds, the fake suicide and the different user's reactions.
I was mesmerised by No Fun, watching and listening to the other user's reactions for some time. The experience is really unsettling, not least because it exposes the immoral side to human nature (In the time I watched it, only 1 person called 911; some didn't take it seriously but most of those who did quickly disconnected, keen to alleviate themselves from the situation and any form of moral responsibility).
The other thing at 'LIES Inc.' that really got me was a new work, Plan C and the ominously named The Liquidator, described by site as a "sculptural merry-go-round". At the end of the Gallery exhbition, we saw a short film called Let Them Believe which documents the development of Plan C. In doing so, it depicts the creation of Plan C as an undercover research trip to Chernobyl, torn and shattered as it is by the 1986 nuclear disaster. According to the film, the merry-go-round was part of an amusement park being built, and was opened early so that it could be enjoyed before the world seemingly ended. Plan C itself was the recovery of a merry-go-round from the site, housed for a few short days at a secret Sheffield location as The Liquidator, the merry-go-round now regenerated or at least cobbled together from materials taken from the Chernobyl site 25 years on. And the materials themselves still hold/emit low-level radioactive charge.
To go on the merry-go-round, we had to sign a disclaimer (!) and were asked to wear Hazmat suits for protection from the radiation. Below you can see Alice, Sarah, Rob, and I all kitted up!
The ride itself was actually really fun. Who doesn't like a merry-go-round? And its location in a disused Sheffield factory by the river was beautiful - street art by Kid Acne and Emarama.
At the end of the ride, we were measured for radiation, as was the ride, with the count continuing to rise.
Plan C and The Liquidator are brilliant works of art, and so unnerving. There's something really perverse about enjoying yourself and having fun on a merry-go-round which signifies tragedy. However, with Eva and Franco Mattes' reputation, can they be trusted? Is The Liquidator really what it claims to be? Or is it another elaborate hoax, with the Let Them Believe film serving to authenticate it? Whichever it is (and I think walking the line between the two is in itself fascinating), it works to expose to us the triviality of artfans contemplating how such a work of art made them feel in the context of the horror and tragedy of Chernobyl, itself with timely parallels to recent events in Japan.
Despite, or perhaps fundamental to, the duplicitous nature of their art, Eva and Franco Mattes certainly have a serious message, and one that asks us to confront who and what we are.
(Pictures come from my iPhone and the kindness of Alison Geldart who has a very interesting blog about words here)
Labels:
art,
hoax,
Site Gallery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Excuse my curiosity, but could you tell me if that work they told about, those 10.000 photos drawn from individual's PCs was indeed exhibited?
I know it is a weird question, and I know that there is no way to know if those images are stolen or not, but I just want to know if that was a prank to increase the expectation regarding the exhibition or if it is a "real" (or at least fake-real) artwork.
Thanks in advance!
The work you're talking about is 'The Others', and yes this was part of the exhibition.
There's no way of ever really knowing whether these images are really stolen from people's private computers or not. I think the point is to put the viewer in a voyeuristic and intrusive position. And of course to make us contemplate the nature of privacy and technology in relation to ourselves in a world increasingly dominated by social networking cultures.
Thanks for reading and for the comment. Hope this helps!
Thanks! I think it is a very interesting work, that's why I was surprised with not reading about it in any blog / magazine (I haven't been able to find a single view of the work).
Congrats for the blog!
Post a Comment